How to Turn LinkedIn Creator Analytics Into a Content Strategy That Really Works
Jan 20, 2026
Luke Costley-White



共鳴
To resonate with others
How to Turn Your LinkedIn Creator Analytics Into a Content Strategy That Actually Works (2026 Edition)
Last Updated: January 15, 2026
Author: Luke Costley-White, DOJO AI
Reading Time: 28 minutes
Word Count: ~7,500 words
Table of Contents
What is LinkedIn Creator Analytics?
LinkedIn Creator Analytics is LinkedIn's free data export tool that provides 365 days of performance data for personal profiles with Creator Mode enabled. It includes post-level metrics (impressions, engagements), audience demographics (job titles, industries, seniority), and follower growth trends.
Key Definition
LinkedIn Creator Analytics = A downloadable Excel file containing 5 data sheets (DISCOVERY, ENGAGEMENT, TOP POSTS, FOLLOWERS, DEMOGRAPHICS) covering the past 365 days of your LinkedIn content performance and audience composition. Available to any LinkedIn member with Creator Mode enabled, regardless of follower count.
Why It Matters for Personal Brands
LinkedIn Creator Analytics provides the only complete historical view of:
Which specific posts drove engagement vs. reach
Who your actual audience is (vs. who you think it is)
When your audience engages most
Which topics consistently perform
How your follower growth correlates with content
Source: LinkedIn Creator Analytics is distinct from LinkedIn's general account analytics and the full data download (which includes connection data, messages, and profile views but lacks the structured content performance analysis).
How to Download LinkedIn Creator Analytics
Prerequisites
LinkedIn account with Creator Mode enabled
Desktop computer (mobile export not available as of January 2026)
No minimum follower count required
Step-by-Step Download Process
Navigate to your LinkedIn profile (desktop browser only)
Click "Analytics" located under your profile picture
Select "Creator analytics" from the dropdown menu
Click "Export" button in the top right corner
Choose date range: Select 365 days for comprehensive analysis (default: last 365 days)
Download Excel file: File downloads automatically as
.xlsxformat
Download frequency recommendation: Quarterly (every 90 days) to track trends over time.
File size: Typically 500KB-2MB depending on posting volume.
What Data LinkedIn Creator Analytics Provides
The 5 Data Sheets Explained
LinkedIn Creator Analytics exports as an Excel workbook containing 5 separate sheets:
1. DISCOVERY Sheet
Metrics included:
Total impressions (last 365 days)
Unique members reached
Aggregate reach data
Use case: High-level performance overview
2. ENGAGEMENT Sheet
Metrics included:
Daily impressions (by date)
Daily engagements (by date)
365-day trend data
Use case: Identify posting patterns, seasonal trends, engagement spikes
3. TOP POSTS Sheet
Metrics included:
Top 50 posts ranked by engagement
Top 50 posts ranked by impressions
Post URLs
Engagement counts
Impression counts
Publication dates
Use case: Content performance analysis, topic pattern recognition
Limitation: Post text is NOT included—only URLs. You must manually visit URLs to see content.
4. FOLLOWERS Sheet
Metrics included:
Total follower count
Daily new followers (by date)
365-day growth trend
Use case: Correlate follower spikes with specific posts
5. DEMOGRAPHICS Sheet
Metrics included:
Job titles: Top roles following you (with percentages)
Locations: Geographic distribution of followers
Industries: Industry breakdown of audience
Seniority levels: Career level distribution (Entry, Mid, Senior, C-Suite, etc.)
Company sizes: Follower distribution by company size (0-10, 11-50, 51-200, etc.)
Companies: Top companies following you (partial list only)
Use case: Verify audience matches Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)
What LinkedIn Creator Analytics Does NOT Include
❌ Missing data:
Individual post text/content (only URLs provided)
Detailed engagement breakdown (comments vs. reactions vs. shares)
Profile views
Click-through rates (CTR)
Direct message (DM) activity
Post-level follower attribution (which post drove which followers)
Performance data beyond top 50 posts
Video view duration
Carousel engagement by slide
Why it matters: You'll need to supplement Creator Analytics with manual tracking for business outcome attribution (DMs → meetings → deals). You can get those insights from your LinkedIn Data Archive.
If you want this to be as fast and painless as possible, you can analyze the whole export with DOJO here.
Comparison: LinkedIn Creator Analytics vs. LinkedIn Data Download
Feature | Creator Analytics | LinkedIn Data Download |
|---|---|---|
Content performance data | ✅ Yes (top 50 posts) | ❌ No |
Audience demographics | ✅ Yes (detailed) | ❌ Limited |
Follower growth trends | ✅ Yes (daily data) | ❌ No |
Connection data | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Message history | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Profile view data | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Engagement rates | ✅ Yes (calculable) | ❌ No |
Export frequency | Unlimited | Limited (30-day cooldown) |
Format | Excel (.xlsx) | ZIP file (multiple CSVs) |
Best for | Content strategy | Personal data archive |
Recommendation: Use both. Creator Analytics for content optimization, Data Download for relationship management and networking insights.
The 6 Core Analyses That Drive Better Content
Analysis 1: Content Performance Analysis
Objective: Identify which posts drove engagement vs. reach, then reverse-engineer why they worked.
What to Analyze
TOP POSTS sheet (both engagement and impression rankings)
Compare high-engagement vs. high-impression posts
Calculate engagement rate for each top post
Engagement Rate Formula
The 4 Post Performance Categories
Category | Description | What It Means | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
High Reach, High Engagement | Viral winner | Content resonated AND spread widely | This is your gold standard—replicate this pattern |
High Reach, Low Engagement | Algorithmic boost without resonance | LinkedIn amplified it, but audience didn't care | Analyze why engagement was weak despite reach |
Low Reach, High Engagement | Core audience hit | Your existing followers loved it, but didn't share | Consider this content for community building |
Low Reach, Low Engagement | Failed post | Neither algorithm nor audience responded | Identify what to avoid in future |
Step-by-Step Process
Export your top 20 posts (by engagement from TOP POSTS sheet)
Visit each post URL and document:
Topic/theme
Format (text post, carousel, poll, video, article, PDF)
Hook/opening line (first 1-2 sentences)
Content elements (personal story, data, contrarian take, tactical how-to)
Tone (educational, provocative, vulnerable, analytical, humorous)
Post length (short <500 chars, medium 500-1200, long 1200+)
Calculate engagement rate for each post using formula above
Identify patterns: Which combinations of topic + format + tone appear most in top performers?
Key Insights to Extract
Format patterns: Do text posts outperform carousels? Do videos underperform?
Topic patterns: Do strategic posts beat tactical ones? Do personal stories drive more engagement than data analysis?
Hook patterns: Do question-based hooks outperform statement-based ones?
Timing patterns: Do certain formats work better on specific days?
Real Example (Author's Data):
Top post: 462 engagements, 30,000 impressions (1.54% engagement rate)
Topic: Strategic competitive analysis
Format: Long-form text post
Elements: Specific data + personal experience + competitive insight
Pattern identified: Data + personal credibility + strategic depth = highest engagement
Analysis 2: Topic Pattern Recognition
Objective: Identify the 3-5 core topics that consistently drive results, which become your content pillars.
What to Analyze
Your top 20-30 posts (by engagement)
Group posts by topic category
Calculate frequency by category
Cross-reference with follower growth spikes
Step-by-Step Process
Create topic categories relevant to your expertise (5-8 categories maximum)
Example categories for a B2B marketer:
Marketing strategy & planning
Personal brand building
Founder/CMO lessons
Industry analysis & trends
Product/tool reviews
Attribution & measurement
Team management
Career development
Tag each top post with 1-2 primary categories
Count category frequency
Identify top 3-5 categories (these are your content pillars)
Validate against business goals: Do these topics align with what you want to be known for?
Your Content Pillars Should Be:
✅ Proven: They appear frequently in your top-performing posts
✅ Aligned: They connect to your business goals and positioning
✅ Sustainable: You can create content on these topics for years without running out of material
✅ Differentiated: You have unique insights or experience in these areas
Red Flags
🚩 You're posting topics that never rank in top posts = Wasting effort on content nobody wants
🚩 Your top topics don't align with business goals = Building audience for the wrong expertise
🚩 You have no clear topic focus = Audience doesn't know what you're about
The Strategic Shift:
Stop trying to cover everything. Commit to 3-5 content pillars and go deep. You'll become known for specific expertise instead of being generically "interested in marketing."
Analysis 3: Timing Analysis
Objective: Identify when your specific audience engages most, then optimize posting schedule.
What to Analyze
ENGAGEMENT sheet (daily impressions and engagements)
TOP POSTS sheet (publication dates of high-performers)
Day-of-week patterns
Seasonal trends
Step-by-Step Process
List publication dates of your top 20 posts
Calculate day-of-week distribution
Identify your highest-engagement days
Look for seasonal patterns in ENGAGEMENT sheet (summer slowdowns, end-of-quarter spikes, holiday dips)
Cross-reference with your posting schedule: Are you posting consistently on your best days?
Common B2B Audience Patterns (2026 Data)
Audience Type | Best Days | Worst Days | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
B2B Corporate (Marketing, Sales, Operations) | Tuesday-Thursday | Monday, Friday | Mid-week = highest LinkedIn engagement; avoid meeting-heavy Mondays and checked-out Fridays |
Founders & Investors | Wednesday, Saturday-Sunday | Monday | Less structured schedules; weekends = reflection time |
Consultants & Freelancers | Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday | Monday | Avoid client-heavy days |
Global Audience (mixed time zones) | Any day, early AM ET | N/A | Someone is always awake; time of day matters less |
Important: These are averages. YOUR data may differ. Trust your own Creator Analytics over generic advice.
Posting Frequency Recommendations by Follower Count
Follower Count | Recommended Frequency | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Under 1,000 | 3-5x per week | Need volume to test and grow; algorithm favors consistency |
1,000-5,000 | 3-4x per week | Balance quality and quantity; audience expects regular content |
5,000-10,000 | 2-3x per week | Prioritize quality over frequency; audience is established |
10,000+ | 2-3x per week | Focus on depth; each post has broader reach |
Source: Analysis of 500+ B2B personal brands on LinkedIn (DOJO AI internal data, 2025).
Analysis 4: Follower Growth Analysis
Objective: Understand which content attracts new followers vs. which engages existing audience.
What to Analyze
FOLLOWERS sheet (daily new follower counts)
TOP POSTS sheet (publication dates)
Correlation between posting dates and follower spikes
Step-by-Step Process
Identify follower growth spikes (days with 10+ new followers for accounts under 5K; 20+ for accounts over 5K)
Note what you posted on spike dates or 1-2 days prior (LinkedIn algorithm delay)
Compare follower-driving posts to engagement-driving posts
Identify differences in:
Topics (broader vs. niche)
Formats (more visual vs. text-heavy)
Accessibility (tactical vs. strategic)
Shareability (quotable vs. deep analysis)
The Two Types of Content You Need
Content Type | Purpose | Characteristics | Example Topics |
|---|---|---|---|
Follower Drivers | Expand reach, attract new audience | Tactical, accessible, shareable, viral-style hooks, controversial takes | "5 ChatGPT prompts for marketing," "Why [popular strategy] is broken," Industry hot takes |
Engagement Drivers | Deepen relationships, build community | Strategic depth, niche insights, community references, personal stories | Strategic frameworks, detailed case studies, personal lessons, industry deep-dives |
The Strategic Balance
Recommended content mix:
40% Follower Drivers (attract new audience)
40% Engagement Drivers (deepen existing relationships)
20% Experimental (test new topics/formats)
Posting pattern:
Week 1: Follower Driver → Engagement Driver → Follower Driver
Week 2: Engagement Driver → Follower Driver → Engagement Driver
Alternate to maintain both growth and depth
Red Flag: Follower Growth Without Engagement
Problem: You're gaining followers (100+ per month) but engagement rate is declining (<1%).
Diagnosis: You're attracting the wrong audience. Your content promises don't match audience expectations.
Fix:
Review demographics of new followers (DEMOGRAPHICS sheet)
Identify if they match your ICP
If not, shift content to attract better-fit audience (even if growth slows)
Quality > quantity for business outcomes
Analysis 5: Audience Composition Analysis
Objective: Verify your audience matches your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) and business goals.
What to Analyze
DEMOGRAPHICS sheet (all sections)
Compare actual audience to your ICP
Identify gaps and mismatches
ICP Alignment Checklist
Use this framework to assess audience fit:
Demographic | Your ICP Target | Your Actual Audience | Match? | Action Needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Job Titles | [e.g., CMOs, VPs Marketing] | [Top 5 from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Adjust content depth/strategy |
Seniority | [e.g., Senior, C-Suite] | [% breakdown from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Shift tactical vs. strategic balance |
Industries | [e.g., B2B SaaS, Fintech] | [Top 5 from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Change examples/case studies |
Company Size | [e.g., 50-500 employees] | [% breakdown from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Adjust complexity of solutions |
Location | [e.g., US, UK, Global] | [Top 5 from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Regional references/timing |
Common Audience-ICP Mismatches and Fixes
Mismatch #1: Job Title Gap
Problem: Want to sell to CMOs, but 80% of audience is Marketing Managers/Coordinators
Diagnosis: Content is too tactical, not strategic enough
Fix: Shift to strategic frameworks, budget planning, team management, executive communication
Mismatch #2: Industry Gap
Problem: Target B2B SaaS, but most followers are agencies or consultants
Diagnosis: Content is too generic or service-provider focused
Fix: Use specific SaaS case studies, product-led growth topics, MRR/ARR metrics
Mismatch #3: Seniority Gap
Problem: Want senior buyers, attracting junior practitioners
Diagnosis: Content depth doesn't match senior experience level
Fix: Reduce "101" content, add strategic depth, assume higher baseline knowledge
Mismatch #4: Geography Gap
Problem: Want global reach, but 75% of followers in one city
Diagnosis: Content has local references, local networking focus
Fix: Use international examples, avoid hyper-local content, post at globally-friendly times
Mismatch #5: Company Size Gap
Problem: Target mid-market (100-500 employees), attracting startups (<50)
Diagnosis: Solutions are startup-focused or budget is discussed as too accessible
Fix: Address scaling challenges, team structure, established company problems
When Your Audience DOES Match Your ICP
Validation signals:
✅ Top job titles are decision-makers in your target market
✅ Top industries match your sales focus
✅ Seniority levels include buyers (Director+)
✅ Company sizes match your product's sweet spot
✅ Locations align with your go-to-market strategy
Action: Double down on what's working. Document your successful content patterns and systematize them.
Analysis 6: Engagement Rate Benchmarking
Objective: Understand if your engagement rates are strong, average, or weak compared to benchmarks.
Engagement Rate Formula (Reminder)
Example:
Post with 5,000 impressions and 150 engagements = 3.0% engagement rate
Post with 20,000 impressions and 200 engagements = 1.0% engagement rate
Result: The first post (3.0%) is higher quality despite lower reach.
LinkedIn Engagement Rate Benchmarks (2026)
Based on analysis of 1,000+ B2B personal brands, January 2026:
Engagement Rate | Performance Level | What It Means | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
<0.5% | Poor | Content isn't resonating; possible audience mismatch | Audit content pillars, test new topics, check ICP alignment |
0.5-1.0% | Below Average | Reaching people but not compelling engagement | Improve hooks, add controversy/personal stories, increase depth |
1.0-2.0% | Average | Typical for most B2B personal brands | Solid baseline; focus on consistency |
2.0-3.5% | Above Average | Building real engagement and community | You're on the right track; document what works |
3.5-5.0% | Strong | Exceptional performance; clear audience fit | Scale what's working; maintain quality |
5.0%+ | Excellent | Top 5% of LinkedIn creators | You've nailed your niche; consider thought leadership expansion |
Source: DOJO AI analysis of B2B personal brands with 1,000-50,000 followers, Q4 2025.
Engagement Rate by Follower Count
Benchmarks vary by follower count (larger accounts typically see lower engagement rates):
Follower Count | Average Engagement Rate | Strong Performance |
|---|---|---|
500-1,000 | 2.0-3.5% | 4.0%+ |
1,000-5,000 | 1.5-2.5% | 3.5%+ |
5,000-10,000 | 1.0-2.0% | 3.0%+ |
10,000-25,000 | 0.8-1.5% | 2.5%+ |
25,000-50,000 | 0.5-1.2% | 2.0%+ |
50,000+ | 0.3-1.0% | 1.5%+ |
Why engagement rates decrease with follower growth:
Larger, more diverse audience = less consistent resonance
Algorithm shows content to broader audience (lower intent)
Passive followers who don't engage regularly
How to Calculate Your Engagement Rate
Individual Post Level:
Open TOP POSTS sheet
For each post: (Engagements ÷ Impressions) × 100
Identify your highest and lowest engagement rate posts
Average your top 10 posts' engagement rates = Your "best" benchmark
Average ALL your posts' engagement rates = Your overall benchmark
Account Level (Annual):
Sum total engagements from ENGAGEMENT sheet (365 days)
Sum total impressions from ENGAGEMENT sheet (365 days)
Calculate: (Total Engagements ÷ Total Impressions) × 100
This is your annual average engagement rate
Why Engagement Rate Matters More Than Reach
Key principle: High engagement rate signals quality to LinkedIn's algorithm, which leads to expanded reach.
The compounding effect:
Post gets early engagement (first 1-2 hours)
High engagement rate signals "valuable content" to algorithm
LinkedIn shows post to broader audience
Reach expands, engagement continues
Post enters "viral" cycle
The death spiral:
Post gets low early engagement
Low engagement rate signals "not valuable"
LinkedIn stops showing post to broader audience
Reach stalls, post dies
Strategic implication: Optimize for engagement rate first, reach will follow. Writing for your core audience (who will engage) is more valuable than writing for broad reach (who won't engage).
Turning Insights Into an Actionable Content Strategy
Now that you've completed the 6 core analyses, here's how to build a data-driven content strategy.
Step 1: Define Your Content Pillars (3-5 Topics)
Based on your Topic Pattern Recognition analysis (Analysis #2), commit to 3-5 core themes.
Content Pillar Criteria Checklist
Your content pillars should be:
✅ Proven by data: They appear frequently in your top-performing posts
✅ Aligned with business goals: They support what you want to be known for
✅ Sustainable long-term: You can create content on these topics for years
✅ Differentiated: You have unique insights, experience, or perspective
✅ Audience-validated: Your ICP cares about these topics
Example Content Pillar Frameworks
B2B Marketer (Growth-stage SaaS):
Marketing attribution & measurement (unique expertise)
AI in marketing operations (emerging trend, you have hands-on experience)
Competitive strategy & positioning (case studies from your work)
Personal brand for B2B leaders (you're building one, teaching what you learn)
CMO/Founder marketing lessons (lived experience)
SaaS Founder:
Product-led growth tactics
Founder mental health & sustainability
B2B sales & closing enterprise deals
Fundraising & investor relations
Building remote teams
Marketing Agency Owner:
Client services & agency operations
Performance marketing tactics
Agency positioning & differentiation
Team building & hiring
Case studies & client results
Content Pillar Distribution
Once you've defined pillars, distribute content evenly:
Example for 3 posts/week (12 posts/month):
Pillar 1: 3 posts (25%)
Pillar 2: 3 posts (25%)
Pillar 3: 2 posts (17%)
Pillar 4: 2 posts (17%)
Pillar 5: 2 posts (17%)
Rule: Don't post the same pillar twice in one week unless responding to a timely event.
Step 2: Identify Your Winning Formats
From your Content Performance Analysis (Analysis #1), you should have identified 2-3 formats that consistently work.
Common LinkedIn Content Formats (2026)
Format | Description | Best For | Typical Engagement Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
Text Post (Short) | <500 characters | Quick insights, provocative takes, questions | 1.5-3.0% |
Text Post (Long) | 1,000-3,000 characters | Strategic analysis, personal stories, frameworks | 2.0-4.0% |
Carousel | Multi-slide PDF (max 15 slides) | Tactical frameworks, step-by-step guides, data visualization | 1.5-2.5% |
Video (Native) | Uploaded directly to LinkedIn | Personal stories, behind-the-scenes, product demos | 0.8-2.0% |
LinkedIn Article | Long-form (1,000-3,000 words) | Definitive guides, thought leadership | 0.5-1.5% |
Poll | Question with 2-4 options | Audience research, debate-starters | 2.5-5.0% |
Document | PDF/DOCX shared as post | One-pagers, checklists, templates | 1.0-2.0% |
Link Share | External link with preview | Blog promotion, resource sharing | 0.5-1.2% |
Note: These are averages. YOUR data may show different patterns.
Format Selection Framework
Rules for choosing formats:
Start with what YOUR data says works (not what works for others)
If a format consistently underperforms (<1% engagement), stop using it
Double down on your top 2 formats (80% of content)
Test new formats sparingly (20% of content)
Match format to content type:
Strategic insights → Long-form text
Tactical frameworks → Carousels
Personal stories → Video or long text
Quick takes → Short text
Data/trends → Carousels with charts
Debates → Polls
Example Format Strategy:
50% Long-form text posts (proven winner)
30% Carousels (consistent performer)
20% Experiments (polls, video, short text)
Step 3: Create a Content Calendar Based on Data
Use insights from Timing Analysis (Analysis #3) and Follower Growth Analysis (Analysis #4) to structure your calendar.
Weekly Content Structure Template
Day | Content Type | Pillar | Format | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Monday | Tactical | Rotate | Carousel or Short Text | Attract new followers (high reach) |
Tuesday | Strategic | Rotate | Long Text | Deepen engagement |
Wednesday | Tactical | Rotate | Poll or Carousel | Attract new followers |
Thursday | Strategic | Rotate | Long Text or Article | Deepen engagement |
Friday | Personal/Community | Any | Short Text or Video | Humanize brand |
Adjustments based on YOUR data:
If Tuesday is your best day, post your highest-quality content then
If weekends work for your audience, shift Friday content to Saturday
If carousels outperform text, increase carousel frequency
Posting Frequency Recommendations
Follower Count | Posts/Week | Focus |
|---|---|---|
Under 1,000 | 3-5 | Volume + consistency (testing phase) |
1,000-5,000 | 3-4 | Quality + consistency (growth phase) |
5,000-10,000 | 2-3 | Quality > quantity (established phase) |
10,000+ | 2-3 | Depth + thought leadership (authority phase) |
Content Calendar Best Practices
✅ Plan 2-4 weeks ahead (but leave 20% flexible for timely content)
✅ Batch content creation (write 3-5 posts in one session)
✅ Rotate through pillars (don't repeat topics within one week)
✅ Alternate reach vs. engagement content (see Analysis #4)
✅ Track performance weekly (adjust based on results)
❌ Don't plan too far ahead (content gets stale, reduces authenticity)
❌ Don't overschedule (leaves no room for timely commentary)
❌ Don't post just to hit frequency targets (quality > quantity always)
Step 4: Set Up a Performance Tracking System
Beyond Creator Analytics, track these metrics to connect content to business outcomes.
Weekly Tracking (Every Monday)
Track in a simple spreadsheet:
Metric | How to Track | Target |
|---|---|---|
Posts published | Manual count | [Your target: 2-5] |
Total impressions | Creator Analytics ENGAGEMENT sheet | Week-over-week growth |
Total engagements | Creator Analytics ENGAGEMENT sheet | Week-over-week growth |
Avg engagement rate | Calculate: Engagements ÷ Impressions × 100 | [Your benchmark from Analysis #6] |
New followers | Creator Analytics FOLLOWERS sheet | [Your target: 10-50+] |
Inbound DMs | Manual count (LinkedIn notifications) | [Your target: 1-10] |
Best performing post | Identify topic + format | Document pattern |
Time investment: 15-20 minutes weekly
Monthly Review (First week of each month)
Deeper analysis:
Best-performing post of the month:
What made it work?
Can I replicate this pattern?
What pillar/format was it?
Worst-performing post of the month:
Why did it flop?
Wrong topic, wrong format, wrong timing?
Should I avoid this in the future?
Engagement rate trend:
Improving or declining month-over-month?
If declining: audience mismatch? content fatigue?
If improving: what changed?
Follower growth rate:
Accelerating or slowing?
Quality of new followers (check DEMOGRAPHICS)
Audience composition shifts:
Are demographics moving toward or away from ICP?
Do I need to adjust content strategy?
Time investment: 1 hour monthly
Quarterly Deep Dive (Every 90 days)
Download fresh Creator Analytics (365 days)
Re-run the 6 core analyses (abbreviated version)
Compare to previous quarter:
What's improving?
What's declining?
What patterns have shifted?
Adjust content strategy:
Update content pillars if needed
Shift format mix based on recent data
Refine posting schedule
Update ICP alignment
Time investment: 2-3 hours quarterly
Step 5: Experiment Systematically
Once you have a baseline, run structured experiments to improve performance.
The Scientific Method for Content Experiments
Rules for valid experiments:
Change only ONE variable at a time (topic, format, timing, hook style, length)
Run for minimum 3-4 posts (one post isn't statistically significant)
Compare to baseline (your average performance)
Document results (write down what you learn)
Decide: adopt, adjust, or abandon (based on data)
Example Experiments to Run
Experiment 1: New Topic Angle
Hypothesis: "My audience will engage with [new subtopic] within [existing pillar]"
Test: Post 3-4 pieces of content on new subtopic
Success metric: Engagement rate ≥ your average
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment 2: New Format
Hypothesis: "Video will drive higher engagement than text posts for [specific topic]"
Test: Create 3-4 videos on proven topics (where you have text post benchmarks)
Success metric: Video engagement rate ≥ text engagement rate for same topics
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment 3: New Posting Time
Hypothesis: "Posting at [time/day] will increase reach and engagement"
Test: Post 4-5 pieces at new time, compare to usual time
Success metric: Impressions and engagement rate ≥ average
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment 4: New Hook Style
Hypothesis: "Question-based hooks drive more engagement than statement-based hooks"
Test: 4 posts with question hooks vs. 4 posts with statement hooks (same topics)
Success metric: Question-based engagement rate > statement-based
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment Tracking Template
Experiment | Hypothesis | Variable Changed | Posts | Avg Engagement Rate | Result | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Video format | Video > text | Format | 4 | 1.2% vs. 2.8% baseline | ❌ Underperformed | Abandon |
Weekend posting | Weekend > weekday | Timing | 4 | 3.5% vs. 2.1% baseline | ✅ Outperformed | Adopt |
Common Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)
Mistake #1: Chasing Reach at the Expense of Engagement
The Problem:
You optimize for impressions (vanity metric) but your engagement rate declines (<1%).
Why It Fails:
LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes engagement rate, not raw reach. Low engagement signals "content isn't valuable" → algorithm reduces future reach → you enter a death spiral.
The Fix:
Optimize for engagement rate first (target: 2-3%+). Focus on writing for your core audience who will engage. Reach will follow if engagement is strong.
How to Implement:
Calculate engagement rate for every post
Aim for consistent 2-3%+ (not viral spikes)
Prioritize depth over breadth in topic choice
Write for your ICP, not for everyone
Mistake #2: Copying Other People's Winning Formats
The Problem:
You see someone succeed with daily carousels/videos/polls, so you copy the format—but yours flop.
Why It Fails:
Their audience ≠ your audience. Their voice ≠ your voice. Their content pillars ≠ your pillars. What works for them may not work for you.
The Fix:
Use YOUR Creator Analytics data. If carousels consistently underperform for you (<1% engagement), stop making them. Do more of what YOUR data says works.
How to Implement:
Run Analysis #1 (Content Performance) on YOUR posts
Identify YOUR top 2-3 formats
Double down on what works for you specifically
Ignore generic advice that contradicts your data
Mistake #3: Posting About Topics Your Audience Doesn't Care About
The Problem:
You want to be known for Topic X, but your audience only engages with Topic Y.
Why It Fails:
Positioning-audience mismatch. You're creating content for the expert you want to be, not the expert your audience needs you to be.
The Fix:
Either (1) reposition how you talk about Topic X to make it relevant to your audience, or (2) accept that your content pillars should include Topic Y.
How to Implement:
Run Analysis #2 (Topic Pattern Recognition)
Identify which topics actually drive engagement
If your desired topics don't appear in top posts, test new angles or pivot
Align content pillars with what your audience wants + what you want to be known for
Mistake #4: Ignoring Audience Composition
The Problem:
You're building a large following (5,000+ followers), but none of them are potential customers, partners, or hires.
Why It Fails:
Vanity metrics (follower count) don't translate to business outcomes (deals, partnerships, opportunities). You're building the wrong audience.
The Fix:
Run Analysis #5 (Audience Composition) regularly. If your audience doesn't match your ICP, adjust content to attract the right people—even if growth slows.
How to Implement:
Quarterly: Check DEMOGRAPHICS sheet
Compare to your ICP
If mismatch: shift content depth, topics, examples
Track: Are new followers getting closer to ICP?
Mistake #5: Not Tracking Business Outcomes
The Problem:
You obsess over likes and comments (vanity metrics) but don't track DMs, meetings booked, deals closed, job offers (business outcomes).
Why It Fails:
Engagement is a leading indicator, but business outcomes are the actual goal. You can't prove ROI of your LinkedIn presence without tracking outcomes.
The Fix:
Manually track qualitative outcomes:
Inbound DMs per week (and source if they mention a post)
DMs → meetings conversion rate
Meetings → opportunities conversion rate
Which posts drove the highest-quality outcomes
How to Implement:
Create a simple tracking spreadsheet:
Date | DM Received | Source Post (if mentioned) | Meeting Booked? | Opportunity? | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-15 | Yes | [Post URL about GEO strategy] | Yes | Demo booked | TBD |
2026-01-16 | Yes | [Post about marketing budgets] | No | Not qualified | — |
Pattern to track:
Which content pillars drive most inbound?
Which formats lead to highest-quality conversations?
Lag time between post → DM (typically 24-72 hours)
Advanced: Connecting LinkedIn Performance to Business Outcomes
The Attribution Gap Problem
The uncomfortable truth:
LinkedIn Creator Analytics shows content performance (impressions, engagements) but NOT business outcomes (DMs, meetings, deals, revenue).
The gap:
Content performance → ??? → business outcomes
Most personal brands can't connect these dots, which means they can't prove ROI.
Manual Business Outcome Tracking System
Since LinkedIn doesn't provide this data, you must track it manually.
Step 1: Log All Inbound DMs
Create a simple spreadsheet:
Date | Contact Name | Title | Company | Source (if mentioned) | Message Type | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-15 | John Smith | CMO | Acme Inc | "Saw your post on GEO" | Partnership inquiry | Meeting scheduled |
2026-01-16 | Jane Doe | VP Marketing | TechCo | "Following your content" | General networking | No action |
Step 2: Track Conversion Funnel
Stage | Definition | How to Track |
|---|---|---|
Inbound DM | Someone messages you on LinkedIn | Count weekly |
Qualified conversation | DM is from ICP, relevant topic | % of total DMs |
Meeting scheduled | Conversation → meeting/call booked | Conversion rate (DMs → meetings) |
Opportunity created | Meeting → potential deal/partnership | Conversion rate (meetings → opps) |
Closed outcome | Deal closed, partnership signed, job offer | Conversion rate (opps → closed) |
Step 3: Attribute to Content
When someone DMs you, ask (casually):
"What made you reach out?"
"Have you been following my content? Any post in particular stand out?"
Document if they mention:
Specific post (record URL)
General topic/pillar
Format that resonated
Timeframe (how long they've been following)
Step 4: Identify High-Value Content
Over time, you'll identify:
Topics that drive inbound: Which content pillars generate most qualified DMs?
Formats that drive conversations: Do long-form posts drive more DMs than carousels?
Quality vs. quantity: Does a post with 50 engagements drive better outcomes than a post with 200 engagements?
Real Example: Quality Over Vanity Metrics
Post A (Viral):
15,000 impressions
300 engagements (2% engagement rate)
25 new followers
0 qualified DMs
Post B (Niche):
2,000 impressions
80 engagements (4% engagement rate)
3 new followers
5 qualified DMs → 2 meetings → 1 closed deal
Result: Post B is more valuable for business outcomes despite lower vanity metrics.
Strategic implication: Once you identify which content drives business outcomes, prioritize that content—even if it doesn't get the most likes.
The DOJO AI Advantage: Automating This Analysis
Everything in this guide is achievable with manual analysis of your Creator Analytics export and a spreadsheet.
The problem: It's time-consuming (3-5 hours per month). Most people don't do it consistently.
How DOJO AI Automates LinkedIn Analysis
DOJO AI's content intelligence system automatically:
Pulls your personal LinkedIn performance data
Runs the 6 core analyses continuously (no manual work)
Identifies your top-performing topics and formats (AI pattern recognition)
Tracks engagement trends over time (automated dashboards)
Compares your performance to benchmarks
Suggests content ideas based on what's working for you
Connects LinkedIn performance to business outcomes
The result:
You spend less time analyzing data and more time creating content that drives business outcomes.
Additional capabilities:
AI-powered content voice analysis (ensure brand consistency)
Content pillar recommendations (based on your expertise + audience response)
Optimal posting schedule (personalized to your audience's behavior)
Competitor benchmarking (how do you compare to others in your space?)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: How often should I download my LinkedIn Creator Analytics?
Answer: Download quarterly (every 90 days) to track trends over time. Each download gives you a rolling 365-day window, so quarterly downloads let you compare year-over-year and spot seasonal patterns.
Recommended schedule:
Q1: Early January
Q2: Early April
Q3: Early July
Q4: Early October
Q2: What's the difference between LinkedIn Creator Analytics and LinkedIn Data Download?
Answer: They're two separate exports with different data:
Creator Analytics:
Content performance metrics (impressions, engagements)
Top 50 posts
Audience demographics
Follower growth trends
Best for: Content strategy optimization
Data Download:
Connection data
Message history
Profile views
Your posts (text, but not performance)
Best for: Personal data archive and relationship management
Recommendation: Use both. Creator Analytics for content strategy, Data Download for networking insights.
Q3: What's a good engagement rate on LinkedIn in 2026?
Answer: Depends on your follower count, but general benchmarks:
Under 1,000 followers: 2-4% is good
1,000-5,000 followers: 1.5-3% is good
5,000-10,000 followers: 1-2.5% is good
10,000-50,000 followers: 0.8-2% is good
50,000+ followers: 0.5-1.5% is good
Context matters: A 1.5% engagement rate from 100% ICP-matched audience is better than 3% from a mismatched audience.
Q4: How many posts do I need before this analysis is valuable?
Answer: Minimum 30-50 posts over 3-6 months. Below that, patterns aren't statistically significant.
If you're just starting:
Post consistently (3x/week) for 2-3 months
Then download Creator Analytics
Run the 6 core analyses
Use insights to optimize going forward
Q5: Should I optimize for engagement or impressions?
Answer: Engagement rate, not raw impressions.
Why: LinkedIn's algorithm rewards engagement. High engagement signals valuable content → algorithm expands reach → impressions grow organically.
The compounding effect:
High engagement → More reach → More engagement → Even more reach (virtuous cycle)
Low engagement → Less reach → Low engagement → Even less reach (death spiral)
Strategy: Write for your core audience who will engage. Reach will follow.
Q6: How do I know if I'm reaching the right audience?
Answer: Run Analysis #5 (Audience Composition). Compare your DEMOGRAPHICS data to your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP).
Red flags:
Job titles don't match buyers/decision-makers
Industries don't overlap with your target market
Seniority skews junior when you need senior
Company sizes don't match your product's sweet spot
If mismatched: Adjust content depth, topics, and examples to attract your ICP (even if growth slows temporarily).
Q7: What if my best-performing topics don't align with my business goals?
Answer: You have three options:
Reposition the topic: Find the angle that connects audience interest to your business goals
Example: Audience engages with "career advice" but you sell marketing software → Angle = "how to advance your marketing career by mastering [your software category]"
Accept the mismatch and adjust: Include high-engagement topics as 20-30% of content (audience building), use 70-80% for business-aligned topics (business outcomes)
Pivot your positioning: If audience consistently engages with unexpected topics, maybe that's a signal your positioning should evolve
Don't ignore the data. Your audience is telling you something valuable.
Q8: How long does it take to see results from optimizing my LinkedIn strategy?
Answer: Timeline for results:
2-4 weeks: You'll notice which specific posts perform better with new approach
1-2 months: Engagement rate trends become clear
2-3 months: Follower growth changes become measurable
3-6 months: Business outcomes (DMs, meetings, opportunities) compound
Important: Consistency matters more than perfect execution. Posting 3x/week with 80% optimization beats posting 1x/week with 100% optimization.
Q9: What if I don't have Creator Mode enabled?
Answer: Enable it immediately. It's free and gives you access to Creator Analytics.
How to enable Creator Mode:
Go to your LinkedIn profile
Click "Resources" in your profile section
Select "Creator mode"
Toggle on
Choose up to 5 topics you post about
Benefits:
Access to Creator Analytics
"Follow" button becomes primary (instead of "Connect")
LinkedIn Live access (if eligible)
Profile shows up in search for your topics
Downside: None. Enable it.
Q10: Can I use Creator Analytics if I have a company page instead of a personal profile?
Answer: No. Creator Analytics is only available for personal LinkedIn profiles with Creator Mode enabled.
Company pages have separate analytics in LinkedIn Page Analytics, which shows:
Page views
Post impressions and engagement
Follower demographics
Visitor demographics
Different from Creator Analytics: Company page analytics lack the detailed top-post export and 365-day historical data that Creator Analytics provides.
Recommendation: If you're building thought leadership, prioritize your personal profile. Company pages have 10-20x lower organic reach than personal profiles on LinkedIn.
Key Terms Glossary
Engagement Rate: (Total Engagements ÷ Total Impressions) × 100. Measures percentage of people who engaged with your content after seeing it.
Creator Mode: LinkedIn profile setting that unlocks Creator Analytics, LinkedIn Live, and other creator features.
Content Pillars: The 3-5 core topics you consistently post about to build topical authority.
ICP (Ideal Customer Profile): The specific job titles, industries, seniority levels, and company sizes that represent your target audience.
Follower Drivers: Content designed to attract new followers (broader appeal, tactical focus).
Engagement Drivers: Content designed to deepen relationships with existing audience (strategic depth, niche focus).
TOP POSTS Sheet: Tab in Creator Analytics export showing your top 50 posts by engagement and impressions.
DEMOGRAPHICS Sheet: Tab in Creator Analytics export showing audience breakdown by job titles, industries, seniority, company size, and location.
Summary: The 5 Most Important Takeaways
Download LinkedIn Creator Analytics quarterly (365-day window) to track content performance, audience composition, and follower growth trends.
Run the 6 core analyses (content performance, topic patterns, timing, follower growth, audience composition, engagement rates) to identify what actually works for YOUR audience.
Optimize for engagement rate (2-3%+), not raw reach. High engagement signals quality to LinkedIn's algorithm, which expands reach organically.
Define 3-5 content pillars based on what your data shows resonates, not what you think should work.
Track business outcomes manually (DMs → meetings → opportunities) since Creator Analytics doesn't connect content to revenue.
Next Steps: Your 7-Day Action Plan
Day 1: Download your LinkedIn Creator Analytics (365 days)
Day 2: Run Analysis #1 (Content Performance) and Analysis #6 (Engagement Rate)
Day 3: Run Analysis #2 (Topic Patterns) and define your 3-5 content pillars
Day 4: Run Analysis #3 (Timing) and Analysis #4 (Follower Growth)
Day 5: Run Analysis #5 (Audience Composition) and assess ICP alignment
Day 6: Build your data-driven content calendar (4 weeks ahead)
Day 7: Set up weekly/monthly tracking system
Week 2+: Execute your strategy, track results, iterate based on data.
Want the Prompts to Analyze Your Data Faster?
This guide shows you what to analyze and why it matters. But the actual analysis takes 3-5 hours per month.
I've created a LinkedIn Creator Analytics Prompt Library with ready-to-use AI prompts that speed up the entire process. Just plug your data into the prompts and get instant insights on:
Content performance patterns
Topic analysis and content pillar identification
Timing optimization
Follower growth drivers
Audience composition gaps
Engagement rate benchmarking
Business outcome tracking frameworks
The catch: It's only for existing DOJO AI users.
For DOJO Users:
Access the DOJO Academy here: [Coming Soon]
Password: Check the DOJO shared Slack channel
Or check your recent DOJO dispatches, we smuggled them out yesterday [27/01/2026]
Not a DOJO User Yet?
If you want access to the prompt library (and the full DOJO AI platform that automates all of this), book a demo with me here.
We'll walk through how DOJO AI can turn your LinkedIn data—and all your other marketing data—into actionable insights that drive real business outcomes.
About This Guide
Author: Luke Costley-White
Company: DOJO AI
Mission: Help marketers and founders leverage data and AI for measurable growth
Updated: January 15, 2026
Version: 1.0 (AEO-Optimized)
More Resources
The LinkedIn Data Download Masterclass - How to analyze your full LinkedIn data export (connections, messages, profile views)
DOJO AI Blog - Marketing strategy, data analytics, and AI insights
Connect with Luke on LinkedIn - Follow for content on marketing data, personal branding, and AI
Citation Information
To cite this guide:
Costley-White, L. (2026). How to Turn Your LinkedIn Creator Analytics Into a Content Strategy That Actually Works. DOJO AI. Retrieved from https://www.dojoai.com/blog/how-to-turn-linkedin-creator-analytics-into-a-content-strategy-that-really-works
Last Updated: January 15, 2026
Reading Time: 28 minutes
Word Count: ~11,500 words
Your Creator Analytics is a 365-day record of what works. Most people ignore it. You shouldn't.
How to Turn Your LinkedIn Creator Analytics Into a Content Strategy That Actually Works (2026 Edition)
Last Updated: January 15, 2026
Author: Luke Costley-White, DOJO AI
Reading Time: 28 minutes
Word Count: ~7,500 words
Table of Contents
What is LinkedIn Creator Analytics?
LinkedIn Creator Analytics is LinkedIn's free data export tool that provides 365 days of performance data for personal profiles with Creator Mode enabled. It includes post-level metrics (impressions, engagements), audience demographics (job titles, industries, seniority), and follower growth trends.
Key Definition
LinkedIn Creator Analytics = A downloadable Excel file containing 5 data sheets (DISCOVERY, ENGAGEMENT, TOP POSTS, FOLLOWERS, DEMOGRAPHICS) covering the past 365 days of your LinkedIn content performance and audience composition. Available to any LinkedIn member with Creator Mode enabled, regardless of follower count.
Why It Matters for Personal Brands
LinkedIn Creator Analytics provides the only complete historical view of:
Which specific posts drove engagement vs. reach
Who your actual audience is (vs. who you think it is)
When your audience engages most
Which topics consistently perform
How your follower growth correlates with content
Source: LinkedIn Creator Analytics is distinct from LinkedIn's general account analytics and the full data download (which includes connection data, messages, and profile views but lacks the structured content performance analysis).
How to Download LinkedIn Creator Analytics
Prerequisites
LinkedIn account with Creator Mode enabled
Desktop computer (mobile export not available as of January 2026)
No minimum follower count required
Step-by-Step Download Process
Navigate to your LinkedIn profile (desktop browser only)
Click "Analytics" located under your profile picture
Select "Creator analytics" from the dropdown menu
Click "Export" button in the top right corner
Choose date range: Select 365 days for comprehensive analysis (default: last 365 days)
Download Excel file: File downloads automatically as
.xlsxformat
Download frequency recommendation: Quarterly (every 90 days) to track trends over time.
File size: Typically 500KB-2MB depending on posting volume.
What Data LinkedIn Creator Analytics Provides
The 5 Data Sheets Explained
LinkedIn Creator Analytics exports as an Excel workbook containing 5 separate sheets:
1. DISCOVERY Sheet
Metrics included:
Total impressions (last 365 days)
Unique members reached
Aggregate reach data
Use case: High-level performance overview
2. ENGAGEMENT Sheet
Metrics included:
Daily impressions (by date)
Daily engagements (by date)
365-day trend data
Use case: Identify posting patterns, seasonal trends, engagement spikes
3. TOP POSTS Sheet
Metrics included:
Top 50 posts ranked by engagement
Top 50 posts ranked by impressions
Post URLs
Engagement counts
Impression counts
Publication dates
Use case: Content performance analysis, topic pattern recognition
Limitation: Post text is NOT included—only URLs. You must manually visit URLs to see content.
4. FOLLOWERS Sheet
Metrics included:
Total follower count
Daily new followers (by date)
365-day growth trend
Use case: Correlate follower spikes with specific posts
5. DEMOGRAPHICS Sheet
Metrics included:
Job titles: Top roles following you (with percentages)
Locations: Geographic distribution of followers
Industries: Industry breakdown of audience
Seniority levels: Career level distribution (Entry, Mid, Senior, C-Suite, etc.)
Company sizes: Follower distribution by company size (0-10, 11-50, 51-200, etc.)
Companies: Top companies following you (partial list only)
Use case: Verify audience matches Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)
What LinkedIn Creator Analytics Does NOT Include
❌ Missing data:
Individual post text/content (only URLs provided)
Detailed engagement breakdown (comments vs. reactions vs. shares)
Profile views
Click-through rates (CTR)
Direct message (DM) activity
Post-level follower attribution (which post drove which followers)
Performance data beyond top 50 posts
Video view duration
Carousel engagement by slide
Why it matters: You'll need to supplement Creator Analytics with manual tracking for business outcome attribution (DMs → meetings → deals). You can get those insights from your LinkedIn Data Archive.
If you want this to be as fast and painless as possible, you can analyze the whole export with DOJO here.
Comparison: LinkedIn Creator Analytics vs. LinkedIn Data Download
Feature | Creator Analytics | LinkedIn Data Download |
|---|---|---|
Content performance data | ✅ Yes (top 50 posts) | ❌ No |
Audience demographics | ✅ Yes (detailed) | ❌ Limited |
Follower growth trends | ✅ Yes (daily data) | ❌ No |
Connection data | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Message history | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Profile view data | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Engagement rates | ✅ Yes (calculable) | ❌ No |
Export frequency | Unlimited | Limited (30-day cooldown) |
Format | Excel (.xlsx) | ZIP file (multiple CSVs) |
Best for | Content strategy | Personal data archive |
Recommendation: Use both. Creator Analytics for content optimization, Data Download for relationship management and networking insights.
The 6 Core Analyses That Drive Better Content
Analysis 1: Content Performance Analysis
Objective: Identify which posts drove engagement vs. reach, then reverse-engineer why they worked.
What to Analyze
TOP POSTS sheet (both engagement and impression rankings)
Compare high-engagement vs. high-impression posts
Calculate engagement rate for each top post
Engagement Rate Formula
The 4 Post Performance Categories
Category | Description | What It Means | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
High Reach, High Engagement | Viral winner | Content resonated AND spread widely | This is your gold standard—replicate this pattern |
High Reach, Low Engagement | Algorithmic boost without resonance | LinkedIn amplified it, but audience didn't care | Analyze why engagement was weak despite reach |
Low Reach, High Engagement | Core audience hit | Your existing followers loved it, but didn't share | Consider this content for community building |
Low Reach, Low Engagement | Failed post | Neither algorithm nor audience responded | Identify what to avoid in future |
Step-by-Step Process
Export your top 20 posts (by engagement from TOP POSTS sheet)
Visit each post URL and document:
Topic/theme
Format (text post, carousel, poll, video, article, PDF)
Hook/opening line (first 1-2 sentences)
Content elements (personal story, data, contrarian take, tactical how-to)
Tone (educational, provocative, vulnerable, analytical, humorous)
Post length (short <500 chars, medium 500-1200, long 1200+)
Calculate engagement rate for each post using formula above
Identify patterns: Which combinations of topic + format + tone appear most in top performers?
Key Insights to Extract
Format patterns: Do text posts outperform carousels? Do videos underperform?
Topic patterns: Do strategic posts beat tactical ones? Do personal stories drive more engagement than data analysis?
Hook patterns: Do question-based hooks outperform statement-based ones?
Timing patterns: Do certain formats work better on specific days?
Real Example (Author's Data):
Top post: 462 engagements, 30,000 impressions (1.54% engagement rate)
Topic: Strategic competitive analysis
Format: Long-form text post
Elements: Specific data + personal experience + competitive insight
Pattern identified: Data + personal credibility + strategic depth = highest engagement
Analysis 2: Topic Pattern Recognition
Objective: Identify the 3-5 core topics that consistently drive results, which become your content pillars.
What to Analyze
Your top 20-30 posts (by engagement)
Group posts by topic category
Calculate frequency by category
Cross-reference with follower growth spikes
Step-by-Step Process
Create topic categories relevant to your expertise (5-8 categories maximum)
Example categories for a B2B marketer:
Marketing strategy & planning
Personal brand building
Founder/CMO lessons
Industry analysis & trends
Product/tool reviews
Attribution & measurement
Team management
Career development
Tag each top post with 1-2 primary categories
Count category frequency
Identify top 3-5 categories (these are your content pillars)
Validate against business goals: Do these topics align with what you want to be known for?
Your Content Pillars Should Be:
✅ Proven: They appear frequently in your top-performing posts
✅ Aligned: They connect to your business goals and positioning
✅ Sustainable: You can create content on these topics for years without running out of material
✅ Differentiated: You have unique insights or experience in these areas
Red Flags
🚩 You're posting topics that never rank in top posts = Wasting effort on content nobody wants
🚩 Your top topics don't align with business goals = Building audience for the wrong expertise
🚩 You have no clear topic focus = Audience doesn't know what you're about
The Strategic Shift:
Stop trying to cover everything. Commit to 3-5 content pillars and go deep. You'll become known for specific expertise instead of being generically "interested in marketing."
Analysis 3: Timing Analysis
Objective: Identify when your specific audience engages most, then optimize posting schedule.
What to Analyze
ENGAGEMENT sheet (daily impressions and engagements)
TOP POSTS sheet (publication dates of high-performers)
Day-of-week patterns
Seasonal trends
Step-by-Step Process
List publication dates of your top 20 posts
Calculate day-of-week distribution
Identify your highest-engagement days
Look for seasonal patterns in ENGAGEMENT sheet (summer slowdowns, end-of-quarter spikes, holiday dips)
Cross-reference with your posting schedule: Are you posting consistently on your best days?
Common B2B Audience Patterns (2026 Data)
Audience Type | Best Days | Worst Days | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
B2B Corporate (Marketing, Sales, Operations) | Tuesday-Thursday | Monday, Friday | Mid-week = highest LinkedIn engagement; avoid meeting-heavy Mondays and checked-out Fridays |
Founders & Investors | Wednesday, Saturday-Sunday | Monday | Less structured schedules; weekends = reflection time |
Consultants & Freelancers | Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday | Monday | Avoid client-heavy days |
Global Audience (mixed time zones) | Any day, early AM ET | N/A | Someone is always awake; time of day matters less |
Important: These are averages. YOUR data may differ. Trust your own Creator Analytics over generic advice.
Posting Frequency Recommendations by Follower Count
Follower Count | Recommended Frequency | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Under 1,000 | 3-5x per week | Need volume to test and grow; algorithm favors consistency |
1,000-5,000 | 3-4x per week | Balance quality and quantity; audience expects regular content |
5,000-10,000 | 2-3x per week | Prioritize quality over frequency; audience is established |
10,000+ | 2-3x per week | Focus on depth; each post has broader reach |
Source: Analysis of 500+ B2B personal brands on LinkedIn (DOJO AI internal data, 2025).
Analysis 4: Follower Growth Analysis
Objective: Understand which content attracts new followers vs. which engages existing audience.
What to Analyze
FOLLOWERS sheet (daily new follower counts)
TOP POSTS sheet (publication dates)
Correlation between posting dates and follower spikes
Step-by-Step Process
Identify follower growth spikes (days with 10+ new followers for accounts under 5K; 20+ for accounts over 5K)
Note what you posted on spike dates or 1-2 days prior (LinkedIn algorithm delay)
Compare follower-driving posts to engagement-driving posts
Identify differences in:
Topics (broader vs. niche)
Formats (more visual vs. text-heavy)
Accessibility (tactical vs. strategic)
Shareability (quotable vs. deep analysis)
The Two Types of Content You Need
Content Type | Purpose | Characteristics | Example Topics |
|---|---|---|---|
Follower Drivers | Expand reach, attract new audience | Tactical, accessible, shareable, viral-style hooks, controversial takes | "5 ChatGPT prompts for marketing," "Why [popular strategy] is broken," Industry hot takes |
Engagement Drivers | Deepen relationships, build community | Strategic depth, niche insights, community references, personal stories | Strategic frameworks, detailed case studies, personal lessons, industry deep-dives |
The Strategic Balance
Recommended content mix:
40% Follower Drivers (attract new audience)
40% Engagement Drivers (deepen existing relationships)
20% Experimental (test new topics/formats)
Posting pattern:
Week 1: Follower Driver → Engagement Driver → Follower Driver
Week 2: Engagement Driver → Follower Driver → Engagement Driver
Alternate to maintain both growth and depth
Red Flag: Follower Growth Without Engagement
Problem: You're gaining followers (100+ per month) but engagement rate is declining (<1%).
Diagnosis: You're attracting the wrong audience. Your content promises don't match audience expectations.
Fix:
Review demographics of new followers (DEMOGRAPHICS sheet)
Identify if they match your ICP
If not, shift content to attract better-fit audience (even if growth slows)
Quality > quantity for business outcomes
Analysis 5: Audience Composition Analysis
Objective: Verify your audience matches your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) and business goals.
What to Analyze
DEMOGRAPHICS sheet (all sections)
Compare actual audience to your ICP
Identify gaps and mismatches
ICP Alignment Checklist
Use this framework to assess audience fit:
Demographic | Your ICP Target | Your Actual Audience | Match? | Action Needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Job Titles | [e.g., CMOs, VPs Marketing] | [Top 5 from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Adjust content depth/strategy |
Seniority | [e.g., Senior, C-Suite] | [% breakdown from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Shift tactical vs. strategic balance |
Industries | [e.g., B2B SaaS, Fintech] | [Top 5 from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Change examples/case studies |
Company Size | [e.g., 50-500 employees] | [% breakdown from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Adjust complexity of solutions |
Location | [e.g., US, UK, Global] | [Top 5 from DEMOGRAPHICS] | ✅/❌ | Regional references/timing |
Common Audience-ICP Mismatches and Fixes
Mismatch #1: Job Title Gap
Problem: Want to sell to CMOs, but 80% of audience is Marketing Managers/Coordinators
Diagnosis: Content is too tactical, not strategic enough
Fix: Shift to strategic frameworks, budget planning, team management, executive communication
Mismatch #2: Industry Gap
Problem: Target B2B SaaS, but most followers are agencies or consultants
Diagnosis: Content is too generic or service-provider focused
Fix: Use specific SaaS case studies, product-led growth topics, MRR/ARR metrics
Mismatch #3: Seniority Gap
Problem: Want senior buyers, attracting junior practitioners
Diagnosis: Content depth doesn't match senior experience level
Fix: Reduce "101" content, add strategic depth, assume higher baseline knowledge
Mismatch #4: Geography Gap
Problem: Want global reach, but 75% of followers in one city
Diagnosis: Content has local references, local networking focus
Fix: Use international examples, avoid hyper-local content, post at globally-friendly times
Mismatch #5: Company Size Gap
Problem: Target mid-market (100-500 employees), attracting startups (<50)
Diagnosis: Solutions are startup-focused or budget is discussed as too accessible
Fix: Address scaling challenges, team structure, established company problems
When Your Audience DOES Match Your ICP
Validation signals:
✅ Top job titles are decision-makers in your target market
✅ Top industries match your sales focus
✅ Seniority levels include buyers (Director+)
✅ Company sizes match your product's sweet spot
✅ Locations align with your go-to-market strategy
Action: Double down on what's working. Document your successful content patterns and systematize them.
Analysis 6: Engagement Rate Benchmarking
Objective: Understand if your engagement rates are strong, average, or weak compared to benchmarks.
Engagement Rate Formula (Reminder)
Example:
Post with 5,000 impressions and 150 engagements = 3.0% engagement rate
Post with 20,000 impressions and 200 engagements = 1.0% engagement rate
Result: The first post (3.0%) is higher quality despite lower reach.
LinkedIn Engagement Rate Benchmarks (2026)
Based on analysis of 1,000+ B2B personal brands, January 2026:
Engagement Rate | Performance Level | What It Means | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
<0.5% | Poor | Content isn't resonating; possible audience mismatch | Audit content pillars, test new topics, check ICP alignment |
0.5-1.0% | Below Average | Reaching people but not compelling engagement | Improve hooks, add controversy/personal stories, increase depth |
1.0-2.0% | Average | Typical for most B2B personal brands | Solid baseline; focus on consistency |
2.0-3.5% | Above Average | Building real engagement and community | You're on the right track; document what works |
3.5-5.0% | Strong | Exceptional performance; clear audience fit | Scale what's working; maintain quality |
5.0%+ | Excellent | Top 5% of LinkedIn creators | You've nailed your niche; consider thought leadership expansion |
Source: DOJO AI analysis of B2B personal brands with 1,000-50,000 followers, Q4 2025.
Engagement Rate by Follower Count
Benchmarks vary by follower count (larger accounts typically see lower engagement rates):
Follower Count | Average Engagement Rate | Strong Performance |
|---|---|---|
500-1,000 | 2.0-3.5% | 4.0%+ |
1,000-5,000 | 1.5-2.5% | 3.5%+ |
5,000-10,000 | 1.0-2.0% | 3.0%+ |
10,000-25,000 | 0.8-1.5% | 2.5%+ |
25,000-50,000 | 0.5-1.2% | 2.0%+ |
50,000+ | 0.3-1.0% | 1.5%+ |
Why engagement rates decrease with follower growth:
Larger, more diverse audience = less consistent resonance
Algorithm shows content to broader audience (lower intent)
Passive followers who don't engage regularly
How to Calculate Your Engagement Rate
Individual Post Level:
Open TOP POSTS sheet
For each post: (Engagements ÷ Impressions) × 100
Identify your highest and lowest engagement rate posts
Average your top 10 posts' engagement rates = Your "best" benchmark
Average ALL your posts' engagement rates = Your overall benchmark
Account Level (Annual):
Sum total engagements from ENGAGEMENT sheet (365 days)
Sum total impressions from ENGAGEMENT sheet (365 days)
Calculate: (Total Engagements ÷ Total Impressions) × 100
This is your annual average engagement rate
Why Engagement Rate Matters More Than Reach
Key principle: High engagement rate signals quality to LinkedIn's algorithm, which leads to expanded reach.
The compounding effect:
Post gets early engagement (first 1-2 hours)
High engagement rate signals "valuable content" to algorithm
LinkedIn shows post to broader audience
Reach expands, engagement continues
Post enters "viral" cycle
The death spiral:
Post gets low early engagement
Low engagement rate signals "not valuable"
LinkedIn stops showing post to broader audience
Reach stalls, post dies
Strategic implication: Optimize for engagement rate first, reach will follow. Writing for your core audience (who will engage) is more valuable than writing for broad reach (who won't engage).
Turning Insights Into an Actionable Content Strategy
Now that you've completed the 6 core analyses, here's how to build a data-driven content strategy.
Step 1: Define Your Content Pillars (3-5 Topics)
Based on your Topic Pattern Recognition analysis (Analysis #2), commit to 3-5 core themes.
Content Pillar Criteria Checklist
Your content pillars should be:
✅ Proven by data: They appear frequently in your top-performing posts
✅ Aligned with business goals: They support what you want to be known for
✅ Sustainable long-term: You can create content on these topics for years
✅ Differentiated: You have unique insights, experience, or perspective
✅ Audience-validated: Your ICP cares about these topics
Example Content Pillar Frameworks
B2B Marketer (Growth-stage SaaS):
Marketing attribution & measurement (unique expertise)
AI in marketing operations (emerging trend, you have hands-on experience)
Competitive strategy & positioning (case studies from your work)
Personal brand for B2B leaders (you're building one, teaching what you learn)
CMO/Founder marketing lessons (lived experience)
SaaS Founder:
Product-led growth tactics
Founder mental health & sustainability
B2B sales & closing enterprise deals
Fundraising & investor relations
Building remote teams
Marketing Agency Owner:
Client services & agency operations
Performance marketing tactics
Agency positioning & differentiation
Team building & hiring
Case studies & client results
Content Pillar Distribution
Once you've defined pillars, distribute content evenly:
Example for 3 posts/week (12 posts/month):
Pillar 1: 3 posts (25%)
Pillar 2: 3 posts (25%)
Pillar 3: 2 posts (17%)
Pillar 4: 2 posts (17%)
Pillar 5: 2 posts (17%)
Rule: Don't post the same pillar twice in one week unless responding to a timely event.
Step 2: Identify Your Winning Formats
From your Content Performance Analysis (Analysis #1), you should have identified 2-3 formats that consistently work.
Common LinkedIn Content Formats (2026)
Format | Description | Best For | Typical Engagement Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
Text Post (Short) | <500 characters | Quick insights, provocative takes, questions | 1.5-3.0% |
Text Post (Long) | 1,000-3,000 characters | Strategic analysis, personal stories, frameworks | 2.0-4.0% |
Carousel | Multi-slide PDF (max 15 slides) | Tactical frameworks, step-by-step guides, data visualization | 1.5-2.5% |
Video (Native) | Uploaded directly to LinkedIn | Personal stories, behind-the-scenes, product demos | 0.8-2.0% |
LinkedIn Article | Long-form (1,000-3,000 words) | Definitive guides, thought leadership | 0.5-1.5% |
Poll | Question with 2-4 options | Audience research, debate-starters | 2.5-5.0% |
Document | PDF/DOCX shared as post | One-pagers, checklists, templates | 1.0-2.0% |
Link Share | External link with preview | Blog promotion, resource sharing | 0.5-1.2% |
Note: These are averages. YOUR data may show different patterns.
Format Selection Framework
Rules for choosing formats:
Start with what YOUR data says works (not what works for others)
If a format consistently underperforms (<1% engagement), stop using it
Double down on your top 2 formats (80% of content)
Test new formats sparingly (20% of content)
Match format to content type:
Strategic insights → Long-form text
Tactical frameworks → Carousels
Personal stories → Video or long text
Quick takes → Short text
Data/trends → Carousels with charts
Debates → Polls
Example Format Strategy:
50% Long-form text posts (proven winner)
30% Carousels (consistent performer)
20% Experiments (polls, video, short text)
Step 3: Create a Content Calendar Based on Data
Use insights from Timing Analysis (Analysis #3) and Follower Growth Analysis (Analysis #4) to structure your calendar.
Weekly Content Structure Template
Day | Content Type | Pillar | Format | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Monday | Tactical | Rotate | Carousel or Short Text | Attract new followers (high reach) |
Tuesday | Strategic | Rotate | Long Text | Deepen engagement |
Wednesday | Tactical | Rotate | Poll or Carousel | Attract new followers |
Thursday | Strategic | Rotate | Long Text or Article | Deepen engagement |
Friday | Personal/Community | Any | Short Text or Video | Humanize brand |
Adjustments based on YOUR data:
If Tuesday is your best day, post your highest-quality content then
If weekends work for your audience, shift Friday content to Saturday
If carousels outperform text, increase carousel frequency
Posting Frequency Recommendations
Follower Count | Posts/Week | Focus |
|---|---|---|
Under 1,000 | 3-5 | Volume + consistency (testing phase) |
1,000-5,000 | 3-4 | Quality + consistency (growth phase) |
5,000-10,000 | 2-3 | Quality > quantity (established phase) |
10,000+ | 2-3 | Depth + thought leadership (authority phase) |
Content Calendar Best Practices
✅ Plan 2-4 weeks ahead (but leave 20% flexible for timely content)
✅ Batch content creation (write 3-5 posts in one session)
✅ Rotate through pillars (don't repeat topics within one week)
✅ Alternate reach vs. engagement content (see Analysis #4)
✅ Track performance weekly (adjust based on results)
❌ Don't plan too far ahead (content gets stale, reduces authenticity)
❌ Don't overschedule (leaves no room for timely commentary)
❌ Don't post just to hit frequency targets (quality > quantity always)
Step 4: Set Up a Performance Tracking System
Beyond Creator Analytics, track these metrics to connect content to business outcomes.
Weekly Tracking (Every Monday)
Track in a simple spreadsheet:
Metric | How to Track | Target |
|---|---|---|
Posts published | Manual count | [Your target: 2-5] |
Total impressions | Creator Analytics ENGAGEMENT sheet | Week-over-week growth |
Total engagements | Creator Analytics ENGAGEMENT sheet | Week-over-week growth |
Avg engagement rate | Calculate: Engagements ÷ Impressions × 100 | [Your benchmark from Analysis #6] |
New followers | Creator Analytics FOLLOWERS sheet | [Your target: 10-50+] |
Inbound DMs | Manual count (LinkedIn notifications) | [Your target: 1-10] |
Best performing post | Identify topic + format | Document pattern |
Time investment: 15-20 minutes weekly
Monthly Review (First week of each month)
Deeper analysis:
Best-performing post of the month:
What made it work?
Can I replicate this pattern?
What pillar/format was it?
Worst-performing post of the month:
Why did it flop?
Wrong topic, wrong format, wrong timing?
Should I avoid this in the future?
Engagement rate trend:
Improving or declining month-over-month?
If declining: audience mismatch? content fatigue?
If improving: what changed?
Follower growth rate:
Accelerating or slowing?
Quality of new followers (check DEMOGRAPHICS)
Audience composition shifts:
Are demographics moving toward or away from ICP?
Do I need to adjust content strategy?
Time investment: 1 hour monthly
Quarterly Deep Dive (Every 90 days)
Download fresh Creator Analytics (365 days)
Re-run the 6 core analyses (abbreviated version)
Compare to previous quarter:
What's improving?
What's declining?
What patterns have shifted?
Adjust content strategy:
Update content pillars if needed
Shift format mix based on recent data
Refine posting schedule
Update ICP alignment
Time investment: 2-3 hours quarterly
Step 5: Experiment Systematically
Once you have a baseline, run structured experiments to improve performance.
The Scientific Method for Content Experiments
Rules for valid experiments:
Change only ONE variable at a time (topic, format, timing, hook style, length)
Run for minimum 3-4 posts (one post isn't statistically significant)
Compare to baseline (your average performance)
Document results (write down what you learn)
Decide: adopt, adjust, or abandon (based on data)
Example Experiments to Run
Experiment 1: New Topic Angle
Hypothesis: "My audience will engage with [new subtopic] within [existing pillar]"
Test: Post 3-4 pieces of content on new subtopic
Success metric: Engagement rate ≥ your average
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment 2: New Format
Hypothesis: "Video will drive higher engagement than text posts for [specific topic]"
Test: Create 3-4 videos on proven topics (where you have text post benchmarks)
Success metric: Video engagement rate ≥ text engagement rate for same topics
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment 3: New Posting Time
Hypothesis: "Posting at [time/day] will increase reach and engagement"
Test: Post 4-5 pieces at new time, compare to usual time
Success metric: Impressions and engagement rate ≥ average
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment 4: New Hook Style
Hypothesis: "Question-based hooks drive more engagement than statement-based hooks"
Test: 4 posts with question hooks vs. 4 posts with statement hooks (same topics)
Success metric: Question-based engagement rate > statement-based
Timeline: 2-3 weeks
Experiment Tracking Template
Experiment | Hypothesis | Variable Changed | Posts | Avg Engagement Rate | Result | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Video format | Video > text | Format | 4 | 1.2% vs. 2.8% baseline | ❌ Underperformed | Abandon |
Weekend posting | Weekend > weekday | Timing | 4 | 3.5% vs. 2.1% baseline | ✅ Outperformed | Adopt |
Common Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)
Mistake #1: Chasing Reach at the Expense of Engagement
The Problem:
You optimize for impressions (vanity metric) but your engagement rate declines (<1%).
Why It Fails:
LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes engagement rate, not raw reach. Low engagement signals "content isn't valuable" → algorithm reduces future reach → you enter a death spiral.
The Fix:
Optimize for engagement rate first (target: 2-3%+). Focus on writing for your core audience who will engage. Reach will follow if engagement is strong.
How to Implement:
Calculate engagement rate for every post
Aim for consistent 2-3%+ (not viral spikes)
Prioritize depth over breadth in topic choice
Write for your ICP, not for everyone
Mistake #2: Copying Other People's Winning Formats
The Problem:
You see someone succeed with daily carousels/videos/polls, so you copy the format—but yours flop.
Why It Fails:
Their audience ≠ your audience. Their voice ≠ your voice. Their content pillars ≠ your pillars. What works for them may not work for you.
The Fix:
Use YOUR Creator Analytics data. If carousels consistently underperform for you (<1% engagement), stop making them. Do more of what YOUR data says works.
How to Implement:
Run Analysis #1 (Content Performance) on YOUR posts
Identify YOUR top 2-3 formats
Double down on what works for you specifically
Ignore generic advice that contradicts your data
Mistake #3: Posting About Topics Your Audience Doesn't Care About
The Problem:
You want to be known for Topic X, but your audience only engages with Topic Y.
Why It Fails:
Positioning-audience mismatch. You're creating content for the expert you want to be, not the expert your audience needs you to be.
The Fix:
Either (1) reposition how you talk about Topic X to make it relevant to your audience, or (2) accept that your content pillars should include Topic Y.
How to Implement:
Run Analysis #2 (Topic Pattern Recognition)
Identify which topics actually drive engagement
If your desired topics don't appear in top posts, test new angles or pivot
Align content pillars with what your audience wants + what you want to be known for
Mistake #4: Ignoring Audience Composition
The Problem:
You're building a large following (5,000+ followers), but none of them are potential customers, partners, or hires.
Why It Fails:
Vanity metrics (follower count) don't translate to business outcomes (deals, partnerships, opportunities). You're building the wrong audience.
The Fix:
Run Analysis #5 (Audience Composition) regularly. If your audience doesn't match your ICP, adjust content to attract the right people—even if growth slows.
How to Implement:
Quarterly: Check DEMOGRAPHICS sheet
Compare to your ICP
If mismatch: shift content depth, topics, examples
Track: Are new followers getting closer to ICP?
Mistake #5: Not Tracking Business Outcomes
The Problem:
You obsess over likes and comments (vanity metrics) but don't track DMs, meetings booked, deals closed, job offers (business outcomes).
Why It Fails:
Engagement is a leading indicator, but business outcomes are the actual goal. You can't prove ROI of your LinkedIn presence without tracking outcomes.
The Fix:
Manually track qualitative outcomes:
Inbound DMs per week (and source if they mention a post)
DMs → meetings conversion rate
Meetings → opportunities conversion rate
Which posts drove the highest-quality outcomes
How to Implement:
Create a simple tracking spreadsheet:
Date | DM Received | Source Post (if mentioned) | Meeting Booked? | Opportunity? | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-15 | Yes | [Post URL about GEO strategy] | Yes | Demo booked | TBD |
2026-01-16 | Yes | [Post about marketing budgets] | No | Not qualified | — |
Pattern to track:
Which content pillars drive most inbound?
Which formats lead to highest-quality conversations?
Lag time between post → DM (typically 24-72 hours)
Advanced: Connecting LinkedIn Performance to Business Outcomes
The Attribution Gap Problem
The uncomfortable truth:
LinkedIn Creator Analytics shows content performance (impressions, engagements) but NOT business outcomes (DMs, meetings, deals, revenue).
The gap:
Content performance → ??? → business outcomes
Most personal brands can't connect these dots, which means they can't prove ROI.
Manual Business Outcome Tracking System
Since LinkedIn doesn't provide this data, you must track it manually.
Step 1: Log All Inbound DMs
Create a simple spreadsheet:
Date | Contact Name | Title | Company | Source (if mentioned) | Message Type | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-15 | John Smith | CMO | Acme Inc | "Saw your post on GEO" | Partnership inquiry | Meeting scheduled |
2026-01-16 | Jane Doe | VP Marketing | TechCo | "Following your content" | General networking | No action |
Step 2: Track Conversion Funnel
Stage | Definition | How to Track |
|---|---|---|
Inbound DM | Someone messages you on LinkedIn | Count weekly |
Qualified conversation | DM is from ICP, relevant topic | % of total DMs |
Meeting scheduled | Conversation → meeting/call booked | Conversion rate (DMs → meetings) |
Opportunity created | Meeting → potential deal/partnership | Conversion rate (meetings → opps) |
Closed outcome | Deal closed, partnership signed, job offer | Conversion rate (opps → closed) |
Step 3: Attribute to Content
When someone DMs you, ask (casually):
"What made you reach out?"
"Have you been following my content? Any post in particular stand out?"
Document if they mention:
Specific post (record URL)
General topic/pillar
Format that resonated
Timeframe (how long they've been following)
Step 4: Identify High-Value Content
Over time, you'll identify:
Topics that drive inbound: Which content pillars generate most qualified DMs?
Formats that drive conversations: Do long-form posts drive more DMs than carousels?
Quality vs. quantity: Does a post with 50 engagements drive better outcomes than a post with 200 engagements?
Real Example: Quality Over Vanity Metrics
Post A (Viral):
15,000 impressions
300 engagements (2% engagement rate)
25 new followers
0 qualified DMs
Post B (Niche):
2,000 impressions
80 engagements (4% engagement rate)
3 new followers
5 qualified DMs → 2 meetings → 1 closed deal
Result: Post B is more valuable for business outcomes despite lower vanity metrics.
Strategic implication: Once you identify which content drives business outcomes, prioritize that content—even if it doesn't get the most likes.
The DOJO AI Advantage: Automating This Analysis
Everything in this guide is achievable with manual analysis of your Creator Analytics export and a spreadsheet.
The problem: It's time-consuming (3-5 hours per month). Most people don't do it consistently.
How DOJO AI Automates LinkedIn Analysis
DOJO AI's content intelligence system automatically:
Pulls your personal LinkedIn performance data
Runs the 6 core analyses continuously (no manual work)
Identifies your top-performing topics and formats (AI pattern recognition)
Tracks engagement trends over time (automated dashboards)
Compares your performance to benchmarks
Suggests content ideas based on what's working for you
Connects LinkedIn performance to business outcomes
The result:
You spend less time analyzing data and more time creating content that drives business outcomes.
Additional capabilities:
AI-powered content voice analysis (ensure brand consistency)
Content pillar recommendations (based on your expertise + audience response)
Optimal posting schedule (personalized to your audience's behavior)
Competitor benchmarking (how do you compare to others in your space?)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: How often should I download my LinkedIn Creator Analytics?
Answer: Download quarterly (every 90 days) to track trends over time. Each download gives you a rolling 365-day window, so quarterly downloads let you compare year-over-year and spot seasonal patterns.
Recommended schedule:
Q1: Early January
Q2: Early April
Q3: Early July
Q4: Early October
Q2: What's the difference between LinkedIn Creator Analytics and LinkedIn Data Download?
Answer: They're two separate exports with different data:
Creator Analytics:
Content performance metrics (impressions, engagements)
Top 50 posts
Audience demographics
Follower growth trends
Best for: Content strategy optimization
Data Download:
Connection data
Message history
Profile views
Your posts (text, but not performance)
Best for: Personal data archive and relationship management
Recommendation: Use both. Creator Analytics for content strategy, Data Download for networking insights.
Q3: What's a good engagement rate on LinkedIn in 2026?
Answer: Depends on your follower count, but general benchmarks:
Under 1,000 followers: 2-4% is good
1,000-5,000 followers: 1.5-3% is good
5,000-10,000 followers: 1-2.5% is good
10,000-50,000 followers: 0.8-2% is good
50,000+ followers: 0.5-1.5% is good
Context matters: A 1.5% engagement rate from 100% ICP-matched audience is better than 3% from a mismatched audience.
Q4: How many posts do I need before this analysis is valuable?
Answer: Minimum 30-50 posts over 3-6 months. Below that, patterns aren't statistically significant.
If you're just starting:
Post consistently (3x/week) for 2-3 months
Then download Creator Analytics
Run the 6 core analyses
Use insights to optimize going forward
Q5: Should I optimize for engagement or impressions?
Answer: Engagement rate, not raw impressions.
Why: LinkedIn's algorithm rewards engagement. High engagement signals valuable content → algorithm expands reach → impressions grow organically.
The compounding effect:
High engagement → More reach → More engagement → Even more reach (virtuous cycle)
Low engagement → Less reach → Low engagement → Even less reach (death spiral)
Strategy: Write for your core audience who will engage. Reach will follow.
Q6: How do I know if I'm reaching the right audience?
Answer: Run Analysis #5 (Audience Composition). Compare your DEMOGRAPHICS data to your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP).
Red flags:
Job titles don't match buyers/decision-makers
Industries don't overlap with your target market
Seniority skews junior when you need senior
Company sizes don't match your product's sweet spot
If mismatched: Adjust content depth, topics, and examples to attract your ICP (even if growth slows temporarily).
Q7: What if my best-performing topics don't align with my business goals?
Answer: You have three options:
Reposition the topic: Find the angle that connects audience interest to your business goals
Example: Audience engages with "career advice" but you sell marketing software → Angle = "how to advance your marketing career by mastering [your software category]"
Accept the mismatch and adjust: Include high-engagement topics as 20-30% of content (audience building), use 70-80% for business-aligned topics (business outcomes)
Pivot your positioning: If audience consistently engages with unexpected topics, maybe that's a signal your positioning should evolve
Don't ignore the data. Your audience is telling you something valuable.
Q8: How long does it take to see results from optimizing my LinkedIn strategy?
Answer: Timeline for results:
2-4 weeks: You'll notice which specific posts perform better with new approach
1-2 months: Engagement rate trends become clear
2-3 months: Follower growth changes become measurable
3-6 months: Business outcomes (DMs, meetings, opportunities) compound
Important: Consistency matters more than perfect execution. Posting 3x/week with 80% optimization beats posting 1x/week with 100% optimization.
Q9: What if I don't have Creator Mode enabled?
Answer: Enable it immediately. It's free and gives you access to Creator Analytics.
How to enable Creator Mode:
Go to your LinkedIn profile
Click "Resources" in your profile section
Select "Creator mode"
Toggle on
Choose up to 5 topics you post about
Benefits:
Access to Creator Analytics
"Follow" button becomes primary (instead of "Connect")
LinkedIn Live access (if eligible)
Profile shows up in search for your topics
Downside: None. Enable it.
Q10: Can I use Creator Analytics if I have a company page instead of a personal profile?
Answer: No. Creator Analytics is only available for personal LinkedIn profiles with Creator Mode enabled.
Company pages have separate analytics in LinkedIn Page Analytics, which shows:
Page views
Post impressions and engagement
Follower demographics
Visitor demographics
Different from Creator Analytics: Company page analytics lack the detailed top-post export and 365-day historical data that Creator Analytics provides.
Recommendation: If you're building thought leadership, prioritize your personal profile. Company pages have 10-20x lower organic reach than personal profiles on LinkedIn.
Key Terms Glossary
Engagement Rate: (Total Engagements ÷ Total Impressions) × 100. Measures percentage of people who engaged with your content after seeing it.
Creator Mode: LinkedIn profile setting that unlocks Creator Analytics, LinkedIn Live, and other creator features.
Content Pillars: The 3-5 core topics you consistently post about to build topical authority.
ICP (Ideal Customer Profile): The specific job titles, industries, seniority levels, and company sizes that represent your target audience.
Follower Drivers: Content designed to attract new followers (broader appeal, tactical focus).
Engagement Drivers: Content designed to deepen relationships with existing audience (strategic depth, niche focus).
TOP POSTS Sheet: Tab in Creator Analytics export showing your top 50 posts by engagement and impressions.
DEMOGRAPHICS Sheet: Tab in Creator Analytics export showing audience breakdown by job titles, industries, seniority, company size, and location.
Summary: The 5 Most Important Takeaways
Download LinkedIn Creator Analytics quarterly (365-day window) to track content performance, audience composition, and follower growth trends.
Run the 6 core analyses (content performance, topic patterns, timing, follower growth, audience composition, engagement rates) to identify what actually works for YOUR audience.
Optimize for engagement rate (2-3%+), not raw reach. High engagement signals quality to LinkedIn's algorithm, which expands reach organically.
Define 3-5 content pillars based on what your data shows resonates, not what you think should work.
Track business outcomes manually (DMs → meetings → opportunities) since Creator Analytics doesn't connect content to revenue.
Next Steps: Your 7-Day Action Plan
Day 1: Download your LinkedIn Creator Analytics (365 days)
Day 2: Run Analysis #1 (Content Performance) and Analysis #6 (Engagement Rate)
Day 3: Run Analysis #2 (Topic Patterns) and define your 3-5 content pillars
Day 4: Run Analysis #3 (Timing) and Analysis #4 (Follower Growth)
Day 5: Run Analysis #5 (Audience Composition) and assess ICP alignment
Day 6: Build your data-driven content calendar (4 weeks ahead)
Day 7: Set up weekly/monthly tracking system
Week 2+: Execute your strategy, track results, iterate based on data.
Want the Prompts to Analyze Your Data Faster?
This guide shows you what to analyze and why it matters. But the actual analysis takes 3-5 hours per month.
I've created a LinkedIn Creator Analytics Prompt Library with ready-to-use AI prompts that speed up the entire process. Just plug your data into the prompts and get instant insights on:
Content performance patterns
Topic analysis and content pillar identification
Timing optimization
Follower growth drivers
Audience composition gaps
Engagement rate benchmarking
Business outcome tracking frameworks
The catch: It's only for existing DOJO AI users.
For DOJO Users:
Access the DOJO Academy here: [Coming Soon]
Password: Check the DOJO shared Slack channel
Or check your recent DOJO dispatches, we smuggled them out yesterday [27/01/2026]
Not a DOJO User Yet?
If you want access to the prompt library (and the full DOJO AI platform that automates all of this), book a demo with me here.
We'll walk through how DOJO AI can turn your LinkedIn data—and all your other marketing data—into actionable insights that drive real business outcomes.
About This Guide
Author: Luke Costley-White
Company: DOJO AI
Mission: Help marketers and founders leverage data and AI for measurable growth
Updated: January 15, 2026
Version: 1.0 (AEO-Optimized)
More Resources
The LinkedIn Data Download Masterclass - How to analyze your full LinkedIn data export (connections, messages, profile views)
DOJO AI Blog - Marketing strategy, data analytics, and AI insights
Connect with Luke on LinkedIn - Follow for content on marketing data, personal branding, and AI
Citation Information
To cite this guide:
Costley-White, L. (2026). How to Turn Your LinkedIn Creator Analytics Into a Content Strategy That Actually Works. DOJO AI. Retrieved from https://www.dojoai.com/blog/how-to-turn-linkedin-creator-analytics-into-a-content-strategy-that-really-works
Last Updated: January 15, 2026
Reading Time: 28 minutes
Word Count: ~11,500 words
Your Creator Analytics is a 365-day record of what works. Most people ignore it. You shouldn't.